http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2013_01_25/caredit.a1300006
• Graduate school training is too narrow to prepare trainees for the wide array of careers that graduates pursue.
• Too many trainees are
supported by research grants instead of training grants, with the result
that graduate students and postdocs are too often valued mainly as a
labor source rather than for their future scientific potential.
• Postdocs aren't paid well enough or given benefits proportionate to their value and training.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
grad students are very grad student-y
http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2012_09_28/caredit.a1200108
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
The Biology of Belief
http://www.brucelipton.com/
By far, I don't agree with everything this guy says but some things do make you think outside the normal paradigm.
By far, I don't agree with everything this guy says but some things do make you think outside the normal paradigm.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Monday, July 9, 2012
Washington Post Cover story on the job prospects of early career PhD Scientists
A few good nuggets:
"The
lack of permanent jobs leaves many PhD scientists doing routine
laboratory work in low-wage positions known as
“post-docs,” or postdoctoral fellowships. Post-docs used to last a year
or two, but now it’s not unusual to find scientists toiling away for
six, seven, even 10 years. The post-doc system is “dysfunctional and not
sustainable in the long term,” Princeton University
President Shirley Tilghman told top brass at NIH in June."
“They’ll
be employed in something,” said Michael S. Teitelbaum, a senior adviser
to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation who studies the scientific
workforce. “But they go and do other things because they can’t find the
position they spent their 20s preparing for.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)